Ford Galaxy 2003 vs Volkswagen Sharan 2000

 
Ford Galaxy
2003 - 2006
Volkswagen Sharan
2000 - 2010
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 2.3 Petrol2.0 Petrol

Performance

Power: 140 HP115 HP
Torque: 203 NM170 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 12.3 seconds15.2 seconds
Ford Galaxy is more dynamic to drive.
Ford Galaxy engine produces 25 HP more power than Volkswagen Sharan, whereas torque is 33 NM more than Volkswagen Sharan. Thanks to more power Ford Galaxy reaches 100 km/h speed 2.9 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 10.19.4
Real fuel consumption: 11.0 l/100km10.1 l/100km
The Volkswagen Sharan is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Ford Galaxy consumes 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Sharan, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Ford Galaxy could require 105 litres more fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Ford Galaxy consumes 0.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Sharan.
Fuel tank capacity: 70 litres70 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 690 km in combined cycle740 km in combined cycle
890 km on highway940 km on highway
630 km with real consumption690 km with real consumption
Volkswagen Sharan gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Dimensions

Length: 4.64 m4.63 m
Width: 1.81 m1.81 m
Height: 1.73 m1.73 m
Both cars are similar in size. Ford Galaxy is 1 cm longer than the Volkswagen Sharan, width is practically the same also the height of the cars does not differ significantly.
Trunk capacity: no datano data
Turning diameter: 11.1 meters10.9 meters
The turning circle of the Ford Galaxy is 0.2 metres more than that of the Volkswagen Sharan.
Gross weight (kg): 1`8001`800
Safety: no datano data
Quality:
low

low
Volkswagen Sharan has slightly fewer faults.
Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Ford Galaxy, so Volkswagen Sharan quality could be a bit better.
Average price (€): 20002600
Pros and Cons: Ford Galaxy has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • lower price
Volkswagen Sharan has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv