Ford Galaxy 2003 vs Volkswagen Touran 2005
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.3 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 140 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 203 NM | 200 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.7 seconds | 11.2 seconds | |
|
Volkswagen Touran is a more dynamic driving. Ford Galaxy engine produces 10 HP less power than Volkswagen Touran, but torque is 3 NM more than Volkswagen Touran. Due to the lower power, Ford Galaxy reaches 100 km/h speed 2.5 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.0 | 9.5 | |
|
The Volkswagen Touran is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Ford Galaxy consumes 1.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Touran, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Ford Galaxy could require 225 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 630 km in combined cycle | 630 km in combined cycle | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.64 m | 4.39 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.79 m | |
| Height: | 1.73 m | 1.65 m | |
|
Ford Galaxy is larger. Ford Galaxy is 25 cm longer than the Volkswagen Touran, 2 cm wider, while the height of Ford Galaxy is 8 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 695 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1989 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.1 meters | 11.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Ford Galaxy is 0.1 metres less than that of the Volkswagen Touran. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`800 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | below average | |
| Volkswagen Touran has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Ford Galaxy has serious deffects in 30 percent more cases than Volkswagen Touran, so Volkswagen Touran quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 2000 | 2000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Volkswagen Touran has
| |