Ford Galaxy 2003 vs Citroen C8 2002
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.3 Petrol | 2.2 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 140 HP | 160 HP | |
| Torque: | 203 NM | 217 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.7 seconds | 11.6 seconds | |
|
Citroen C8 is a more dynamic driving. Ford Galaxy engine produces 20 HP less power than Citroen C8, whereas torque is 14 NM less than Citroen C8. Due to the lower power, Ford Galaxy reaches 100 km/h speed 2.1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.0 | 9.7 | |
|
The Citroen C8 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Ford Galaxy consumes 1.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Citroen C8, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Ford Galaxy could require 195 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 80 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 630 km in combined cycle | 820 km in combined cycle | |
| 810 km on highway | 1020 km on highway | ||
| Citroen C8 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.64 m | 4.73 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.85 m | |
| Height: | 1.73 m | 1.86 m | |
|
Ford Galaxy is smaller. Ford Galaxy is 9 cm shorter than the Citroen C8, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Ford Galaxy is 13 cm lower. | |||
| Seats: | no data | 7 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 225 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | no data | 225 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 2948 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.1 meters | 10.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Ford Galaxy is 0.2 metres more than that of the Citroen C8. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`800 | 2`400 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | low | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 2000 | 2000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Citroen C8 has
| |