Ford Galaxy 2006 vs Ford S-Max 2006

 
Ford Galaxy
2006 - 2010
Ford S-Max
2006 - 2010
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 2.0 Petrol2.0 Petrol

Performance

Power: 145 HP145 HP
Torque: 190 NM190 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 11.2 seconds10.9 seconds
Ford Galaxy and Ford S-Max have the same engine power, the torque is the same for both cars. Ford Galaxy reaches 100 km/h speed 0.3 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 8.28.1
Real fuel consumption: 8.9 l/100km9.4 l/100km
The Ford Galaxy is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise.
By specification Ford Galaxy consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford S-Max, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Ford Galaxy could require 15 litres more fuel.
But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Ford Galaxy consumes 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford S-Max.
Fuel tank capacity: 70 litres70 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 850 km in combined cycle860 km in combined cycle
780 km with real consumption740 km with real consumption

Dimensions

Length: 4.82 m4.77 m
Width: 1.85 m1.85 m
Height: 1.72 m1.66 m
Ford Galaxy is 5 cm longer than the Ford S-Max, width is practically the same , while the height of Ford Galaxy is 6 cm higher.
Seats: no data7 seats
Trunk capacity: 308 litres854 litres
Trunk capacity with 7 seats: no data854 litres
Trunk capacity with 5 seats: 308 litresno data
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
no data2100 litres
Turning diameter: no data11.6 meters
Gross weight (kg): 1`1002`340
Safety:
Quality:
low

below average
Ford S-Max has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Ford Galaxy has serious deffects in 10 percent more cases than Ford S-Max, so Ford S-Max quality is probably slightly better
Average price (€): 42003800
Pros and Cons:
    Ford S-Max has
    • fewer faults
    • lower price
    Share these results to social networks or e-mail
    Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv