Ford Galaxy 1995 vs Seat Alhambra 1996
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Ford Galaxy is available with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive, while Seat Alhambra can be equipped only with front wheel drive. | |||
| Engines: | 1.9 - 2.8 | 1.8 - 2.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 90 - 174 HP | 90 - 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 170 - 240 NM | 170 - 235 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.5 - 19.1 seconds | 12 - 19.3 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.5 - 13.8 | 6.4 - 11.5 | |
|
Ford Galaxy petrol engines consumes on average 0.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than Seat Alhambra. On average, Ford Galaxy equipped with diesel engines consume 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Seat Alhambra. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.62 m | 4.62 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.73 m | 1.73 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Ford Galaxy and Seat Alhambra are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.7 meters | 11.7 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`920 | ~ 1`886 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | low | low | |
| Average price (€): | 800 | 1600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Galaxy has
|
Seat Alhambra has
| |