Ford Galaxy 2000 vs Mitsubishi Space Wagon 1998
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Ford Galaxy is available only with front wheel drive, while Mitsubishi Space Wagon can be equipped with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive. | |||
| Engines: | 1.9 - 2.8 (petrol, diesel) | 2.0 - 3.0 (petrol) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 90 - 204 HP | 136 - 215 HP | |
| Torque: | 170 - 310 NM | 178 - 299 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.9 - 17.2 seconds | 10.7 - 13.1 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.2 - 11.9 | 9.2 - 11.2 | |
|
Ford Galaxy petrol engines consumes on average 0.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than Mitsubishi Space Wagon. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.64 m | 4.60 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.73 m | 1.68 m | |
|
Ford Galaxy is larger. Ford Galaxy is 4 cm longer than the Mitsubishi Space Wagon, 3 cm wider, while the height of Ford Galaxy is 6 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 240 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1930 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.1 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Ford Galaxy is 0.1 metres more than that of the Mitsubishi Space Wagon. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`933 | ~ 2`170 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 1400 | 800 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 7.7/10 | 7.5/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Galaxy has
|
Mitsubishi Space Wagon has
| |