Ford Focus 2011 vs Mazda 3 2011
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 150 HP | 150 HP | |
Torque: | n/a NM | 191 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.3 seconds | 10.4 seconds | |
Ford Focus and Mazda 3 have the same engine power. Ford Focus reaches 100 km/h speed 1.1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.7 | 6.7 | |
Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 55 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 820 km in combined cycle | 820 km in combined cycle | |
1100 km on highway | 1030 km on highway | ||
730 km with real consumption | 670 km with real consumption | ||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.53 m | 4.58 m | |
Width: | 1.82 m | 1.76 m | |
Height: | 1.48 m | 1.47 m | |
Ford Focus is 5 cm shorter than the Mazda 3, 7 cm wider, while the height of Ford Focus is 1 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 372 litres | 430 litres | |
Mazda 3 has more luggage space. Ford Focus has 58 litres less trunk space than the Mazda 3. | |||
Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 10.4 meters | |
The turning circle of the Ford Focus is 0.6 metres more than that of the Mazda 3, which means Ford Focus can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`900 | 1`820 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | below average | high | |
Mazda 3 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Ford Focus has serious deffects in 80 percent more cases than Mazda 3, so Mazda 3 quality is probably significantly better | |||
Average price (€): | 4400 | 5000 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Ford Focus has
|
Mazda 3 has
| |