Ford Focus 2014 vs Mazda 3 2014
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.2 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 150 HP | 150 HP | |
Torque: | 370 NM | 380 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.8 seconds | 8 seconds | |
Mazda 3 is a more dynamic driving. Ford Focus and Mazda 3 have the same engine power, but Ford Focus torque is 10 NM less than Mazda 3. Ford Focus reaches 100 km/h speed 0.8 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.0 | 3.9 | |
Ford Focus consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 3, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Ford Focus could require 15 litres more fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 51 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 1500 km in combined cycle | 1300 km in combined cycle | |
1620 km on highway | 1450 km on highway | ||
Ford Focus gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.53 m | 4.59 m | |
Width: | 1.86 m | 1.80 m | |
Height: | 1.48 m | 1.45 m | |
Ford Focus is 5 cm shorter than the Mazda 3, 6 cm wider, while the height of Ford Focus is 3 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 374 litres | 419 litres | |
Mazda 3 has more luggage space. Ford Focus has 45 litres less trunk space than the Mazda 3. | |||
Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 10.6 meters | |
The turning circle of the Ford Focus is 0.4 metres more than that of the Mazda 3, which means Ford Focus can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 2`050 | 1`910 | |
Safety: | |||
The Mazda 3 scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
Quality: | below average | average | |
Mazda 3 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Ford Focus has serious deffects in 30 percent more cases than Mazda 3, so Mazda 3 quality is probably significantly better | |||
Average price (€): | 8200 | 11 600 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Ford Focus has
|
Mazda 3 has
| |