Ford Escort 1995 vs Nissan X-Trail 2005
Body: | Estate car / wagon | Crossover / SUV | |
---|---|---|---|
Crossovers and SUVs have better off-road capabilities (higher ground clearance, can have 4x4 drive), they are preferable for driving on unpaved roads and rural areas. Also, the driver's seating position is higher in a crossover or SUVs, which provides better visibility also in city. This usually comes at the cost of higher fuel consumption, increased weight and higher maintenance costs. | |||
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 90 HP | 140 HP | |
Torque: | 134 NM | 192 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.7 seconds | 10.3 seconds | |
Nissan X-Trail is a more dynamic driving. Ford Escort engine produces 50 HP less power than Nissan X-Trail, whereas torque is 58 NM less than Nissan X-Trail. Due to the lower power, Ford Escort reaches 100 km/h speed 2.4 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.2 | 9.1 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 8.0 l/100km | 10.1 l/100km | |
The Ford Escort is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Ford Escort consumes 0.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Nissan X-Trail, which means that by driving the Ford Escort over 15,000 km in a year you can save 135 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Ford Escort consumes 2.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Nissan X-Trail. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 60 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 670 km in combined cycle | 650 km in combined cycle | |
830 km on highway | 810 km on highway | ||
680 km with real consumption | 590 km with real consumption | ||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.30 m | 4.51 m | |
Width: | 1.68 m | 1.76 m | |
Height: | 1.36 m | 1.68 m | |
Ford Escort is smaller. Ford Escort is 21 cm shorter than the Nissan X-Trail, 8 cm narrower, while the height of Ford Escort is 32 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | no data | 410 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1841 litres | |
Turning diameter: | 10 meters | 10.6 meters | |
The turning circle of the Ford Escort is 0.6 metres less than that of the Nissan X-Trail, which means Ford Escort can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`200 | 2`000 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | low | average | |
Nissan X-Trail has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Ford Escort has serious deffects in 535 percent more cases than Nissan X-Trail, so Nissan X-Trail quality is probably significantly better | |||
Average price (€): | 600 | 2600 | |
Rating in user reviews: | 8.5/10 | 7.1/10 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Ford Escort has
|
Nissan X-Trail has
| |