Ford Escort 1992 vs Rover 200 1990
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.8 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 105 HP | 112 HP | |
| Torque: | 153 NM | 138 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.7 seconds | 9.5 seconds | |
|
Rover 200 is a more dynamic driving. Ford Escort engine produces 7 HP less power than Rover 200, but torque is 15 NM more than Rover 200. Due to the lower power, Ford Escort reaches 100 km/h speed 1.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.9 | 8.6 | |
|
The Ford Escort is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Ford Escort consumes 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Rover 200, which means that by driving the Ford Escort over 15,000 km in a year you can save 105 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 690 km in combined cycle | 630 km in combined cycle | |
| Ford Escort gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.10 m | 4.22 m | |
| Width: | 1.68 m | 1.68 m | |
| Height: | 1.35 m | 1.40 m | |
| Ford Escort is 12 cm shorter than the Rover 200, width is practically the same , while the height of Ford Escort is 5 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 352 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.5 meters | 10.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Ford Escort is 0.3 metres more than that of the Rover 200. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 900 | 1`580 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | low | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 1600 | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Escort has
|
Rover 200 has
| |