Citroen C5 2010 vs Volvo V60 2018
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 138 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 320 NM | 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.1 seconds | 9.9 seconds | |
|
Volvo V60 is a more dynamic driving. Citroen C5 engine produces 12 HP less power than Volvo V60, the torque is the same for both cars. Due to the lower power, Citroen C5 reaches 100 km/h speed 2.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.8 | 4.6 | |
|
The Volvo V60 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Citroen C5 consumes 2.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo V60, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Citroen C5 could require 330 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 71 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1040 km in combined cycle | 1190 km in combined cycle | |
| Volvo V60 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.83 m | 4.76 m | |
| Width: | 1.86 m | 1.85 m | |
| Height: | 1.48 m | 1.43 m | |
|
Citroen C5 is larger. Citroen C5 is 7 cm longer than the Volvo V60, 1 cm wider, while the height of Citroen C5 is 5 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 505 litres | 529 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1364 litres | |
|
Volvo V60 has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Citroen C5 has 24 litres less trunk space than the Volvo V60. This could mean that the Citroen C5 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.5 meters | 11.3 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Citroen C5 is 0.2 metres more than that of the Volvo V60. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`326 | 2`230 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | average | |
| Average price (€): | 13 800 | 29 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Citroen C5 has
|
Volvo V60 has
| |