Citroen C5 2010 vs Skoda Superb 2013
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 138 HP | 200 HP | |
| Torque: | 320 NM | 280 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.1 seconds | 7.8 seconds | |
|
Skoda Superb is a more dynamic driving. Citroen C5 engine produces 62 HP less power than Skoda Superb, but torque is 40 NM more than Skoda Superb. Due to the lower power, Citroen C5 reaches 100 km/h speed 4.3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.8 | 8.0 | |
|
The Citroen C5 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Citroen C5 consumes 1.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Superb, which means that by driving the Citroen C5 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 180 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 71 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1040 km in combined cycle | 750 km in combined cycle | |
| 1260 km on highway | 930 km on highway | ||
| Citroen C5 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.83 m | 4.83 m | |
| Width: | 1.86 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.48 m | 1.51 m | |
| Citroen C5 and Skoda Superb are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 505 litres | 603 litres | |
|
Skoda Superb has more luggage space. Citroen C5 has 98 litres less trunk space than the Skoda Superb. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.5 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`326 | 2`125 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | below average | |
| Skoda Superb has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Citroen C5 has serious deffects in 10 percent more cases than Skoda Superb, so Skoda Superb quality is probably slightly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 13 800 | 18 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Citroen C5 has
|
Skoda Superb has
| |