Citroen C5 2001 vs Subaru Outback 2002
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 3.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 138 HP | 209 HP | |
| Torque: | 190 NM | 282 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.8 seconds | 8.9 seconds | |
|
Subaru Outback is a more dynamic driving. Citroen C5 engine produces 71 HP less power than Subaru Outback, whereas torque is 92 NM less than Subaru Outback. Due to the lower power, Citroen C5 reaches 100 km/h speed 2.9 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.7 | 10.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 9.4 l/100km | 11.2 l/100km | |
|
The Citroen C5 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Citroen C5 consumes 1.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Subaru Outback, which means that by driving the Citroen C5 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 270 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Citroen C5 consumes 1.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Subaru Outback. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.76 m | 4.72 m | |
| Width: | 1.77 m | 1.74 m | |
| Height: | 1.52 m | 1.58 m | |
|
Citroen C5 is larger, but lower. Citroen C5 is 4 cm longer than the Subaru Outback, 3 cm wider, while the height of Citroen C5 is 6 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 464 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`500 | 2`010 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 1400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Citroen C5 has
|
Subaru Outback has
| |