Chrysler Voyager 1994 vs Nissan X-Trail 2003
Body: | Minivan / MPV | Crossover / SUV | |
---|---|---|---|
Crossovers and SUVs have better off-road capabilities (higher ground clearance, can have 4x4 drive), they are preferable for driving on unpaved roads and rural areas. Also, the driver's seating position is higher in a crossover or SUVs, which provides better visibility also in city. This usually comes at the cost of higher fuel consumption, increased weight and higher maintenance costs. | |||
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
Engine: | 2.5 Petrol | 2.5 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 99 HP | 165 HP | |
Torque: | 185 NM | 230 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 16 seconds | 9.9 seconds | |
Nissan X-Trail is a more dynamic driving. Chrysler Voyager engine produces 66 HP less power than Nissan X-Trail, whereas torque is 45 NM less than Nissan X-Trail. Due to the lower power, Chrysler Voyager reaches 100 km/h speed 6.1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.4 | 9.6 | |
Chrysler Voyager consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Nissan X-Trail, which means that by driving the Chrysler Voyager over 15,000 km in a year you can save 30 litres of fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 75 litres | 60 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 790 km in combined cycle | 620 km in combined cycle | |
Chrysler Voyager gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
Nissan X-Trail 2001: It has selectable four-wheel drive with Auto, 2WD and Lock modes. In Auto mode, it has front-wheel drive under normal conditions, the rear axle engages when the front wheels start to slip, and power is distributed variably up to 50:50 front to rear. In 2WD mode, the transfer clutch is permanently unlocked, but the electronic control unit can engage the rear wheels occasionally, for example during hard acceleration. In Lock mode, the transfer clutch is permanently locked, providing a constant 50:50 power distribution. When vehicle speed increases above 30 km/h (20 mph), it switches to Auto mode, but when speed decreases, it switches back to Lock mode. The system also switches to 2WD mode in the event of overheating. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.52 m | 4.51 m | |
Width: | 1.83 m | 1.76 m | |
Height: | 1.70 m | 1.68 m | |
Chrysler Voyager is larger. Chrysler Voyager is 1 cm longer than the Nissan X-Trail, 7 cm wider, while the height of Chrysler Voyager is 2 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
Turning diameter: | 12.5 meters | 11 meters | |
The turning circle of the Chrysler Voyager is 1.5 metres more than that of the Nissan X-Trail, which means Chrysler Voyager can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`600 | 2`000 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | low | average | |
Nissan X-Trail has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Chrysler Voyager has serious deffects in 545 percent more cases than Nissan X-Trail, so Nissan X-Trail quality is probably significantly better | |||
Average price (€): | 600 | 2000 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Chrysler Voyager has
|
Nissan X-Trail has
| |