Chrysler Voyager 1994 vs Ford Galaxy 1995

 
Chrysler Voyager
1994 - 1995
Ford Galaxy
1995 - 2000
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 2.5 Diesel1.9 Diesel

Performance

Power: 118 HP90 HP
Torque: 260 NM202 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 12.6 seconds17.1 seconds
Chrysler Voyager is more dynamic to drive.
Chrysler Voyager engine produces 28 HP more power than Ford Galaxy, whereas torque is 58 NM more than Ford Galaxy. Thanks to more power Chrysler Voyager reaches 100 km/h speed 4.5 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 6.76.5
Real fuel consumption: 8.3 l/100km6.7 l/100km
The Ford Galaxy is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Chrysler Voyager consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford Galaxy, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Chrysler Voyager could require 30 litres more fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Chrysler Voyager consumes 1.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford Galaxy.
Fuel tank capacity: 75 litres75 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 1110 km in combined cycle1150 km in combined cycle
900 km with real consumption1110 km with real consumption

Dimensions

Length: 4.52 m4.62 m
Width: 1.83 m1.80 m
Height: 1.78 m1.73 m
Chrysler Voyager is 10 cm shorter than the Ford Galaxy, 3 cm wider, while the height of Chrysler Voyager is 5 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 671 litresno data
Turning diameter: 12.5 meters11.1 meters
The turning circle of the Chrysler Voyager is 1.4 metres more than that of the Ford Galaxy, which means Chrysler Voyager can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 1`4002`000
Safety: no datano data
Quality:
low

low
Ford Galaxy has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Chrysler Voyager has serious deffects in 60 percent more cases than Ford Galaxy, so Ford Galaxy quality is probably significantly better
Average price (€): 600800
Pros and Cons: Chrysler Voyager has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • lower price
Ford Galaxy has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • better manoeuvrability
  • fewer faults
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv