Chrysler Voyager 2004 vs Toyota Sienna 2005
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.3 Petrol | 3.3 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 180 HP | 215 HP | |
| Torque: | 285 NM | 301 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.6 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Chrysler Voyager engine produces 35 HP less power than Toyota Sienna, whereas torque is 16 NM less than Toyota Sienna. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 12.7 | 10.7 | |
|
The Toyota Sienna is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Chrysler Voyager consumes 2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Sienna, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Chrysler Voyager could require 300 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 75 litres | 76 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 590 km in combined cycle | 710 km in combined cycle | |
| Toyota Sienna gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.81 m | 5.08 m | |
| Width: | 2.00 m | 1.97 m | |
| Height: | 1.75 m | 1.75 m | |
| Chrysler Voyager is 27 cm shorter than the Toyota Sienna, 3 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 440 litres | 1235 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 4217 litres | |
|
Toyota Sienna has more luggage space. Chrysler Voyager has 795 litres less trunk space than the Toyota Sienna. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.5 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`600 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | low | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 2000 | 7200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chrysler Voyager has
|
Toyota Sienna has
| |