Chrysler Voyager 2004 vs Kia Carnival 2002
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.3 Petrol | 2.9 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing belt | |
| Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 180 HP | 144 HP | |
| Torque: | 285 NM | 310 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.6 seconds | 16.4 seconds | |
|
Chrysler Voyager is more dynamic to drive. Chrysler Voyager engine produces 36 HP more power than Kia Carnival, but torque is 25 NM less than Kia Carnival. Thanks to more power Chrysler Voyager reaches 100 km/h speed 3.8 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 12.7 | 8.8 | |
|
The Kia Carnival is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Chrysler Voyager consumes 3.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Kia Carnival, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Chrysler Voyager could require 585 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 75 litres | 75 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 590 km in combined cycle | 850 km in combined cycle | |
| Kia Carnival gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 10 years | 18 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Chrysler Grand Voyager, Chrysler Town & Country | Used also on Hyundai Terracan | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.81 m | 4.93 m | |
| Width: | 2.00 m | 1.90 m | |
| Height: | 1.75 m | 1.74 m | |
| Chrysler Voyager is 12 cm shorter than the Kia Carnival, 10 cm wider, while the height of Chrysler Voyager is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 440 litres | 302 litres | |
|
Chrysler Voyager has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Chrysler Voyager has 138 litres more trunk space than the Kia Carnival. The Kia Carnival may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.5 meters | 13 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chrysler Voyager is 1.5 metres less than that of the Kia Carnival, which means Chrysler Voyager can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`600 | 2`665 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | low | |
| Chrysler Voyager has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Kia Carnival has serious deffects in 190 percent more cases than Chrysler Voyager, so Chrysler Voyager quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 1800 | 1000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chrysler Voyager has
|
Kia Carnival has
| |