Chrysler Voyager 2004 vs Renault Espace 2002
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.8 Diesel | 2.2 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 149 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 360 NM | 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 11.5 seconds | |
| Chrysler Voyager engine produces 1 HP less power than Renault Espace, but torque is 40 NM more than Renault Espace. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.4 | 7.7 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 9.5 l/100km | 8.2 l/100km | |
|
The Renault Espace is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Chrysler Voyager consumes 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Renault Espace, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Chrysler Voyager could require 105 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Chrysler Voyager consumes 1.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Renault Espace. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 75 litres | 83 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 890 km in combined cycle | 1070 km in combined cycle | |
| 1130 km on highway | 1310 km on highway | ||
| 780 km with real consumption | 1010 km with real consumption | ||
| Renault Espace gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 7 years | 9 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Chrysler Grand Voyager, Jeep Cherokee | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Renault Laguna, Renault Grand Espace, Renault VEL Satis | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Renault Espace might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.81 m | 4.66 m | |
| Width: | 2.00 m | 1.86 m | |
| Height: | 1.75 m | 1.73 m | |
|
Chrysler Voyager is larger. Chrysler Voyager is 15 cm longer than the Renault Espace, 14 cm wider, while the height of Chrysler Voyager is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Seats: | no data | 7 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 291 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | no data | 291 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 2860 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.5 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chrysler Voyager is 0.5 metres more than that of the Renault Espace, which means Chrysler Voyager can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`600 | 2`555 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | low | |
| Renault Espace has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Chrysler Voyager has serious deffects in 15 percent more cases than Renault Espace, so Renault Espace quality is probably better | |||
| Average price (€): | 1800 | 1600 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 8.1/10 | 7.6/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Renault Espace has
| |