Chrysler Voyager 2004 vs Hyundai H1 2004
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.8 Diesel | 2.5 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 149 HP | 140 HP | |
| Torque: | 360 NM | 314 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 12.8 seconds | |
| Chrysler Voyager engine produces 9 HP more power than Hyundai H1, whereas torque is 46 NM more than Hyundai H1. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.4 | 9.3 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 9.5 l/100km | 9.2 l/100km | |
|
By specification Chrysler Voyager consumes 0.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Hyundai H1, which means that by driving the Chrysler Voyager over 15,000 km in a year you can save 135 litres of fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Chrysler Voyager consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Hyundai H1. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 75 litres | 65 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 890 km in combined cycle | 690 km in combined cycle | |
| 1130 km on highway | 910 km on highway | ||
| 780 km with real consumption | 700 km with real consumption | ||
| Chrysler Voyager gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
| Front-wheel drive cars (Chrysler Voyager) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (Hyundai H1) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.81 m | 4.70 m | |
| Width: | 2.00 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.75 m | 1.88 m | |
|
Chrysler Voyager is larger, but lower. Chrysler Voyager is 12 cm longer than the Hyundai H1, 18 cm wider, while the height of Chrysler Voyager is 13 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 480 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 4400 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.5 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`600 | 2`800 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | low | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 1800 | 2000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chrysler Voyager has
|
| |