Chrysler Voyager 2004 vs Renault Grand Espace 2006
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.5 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 140 HP | 175 HP | |
| Torque: | 312 NM | 360 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.9 seconds | 9.8 seconds | |
|
Renault Grand Espace is a more dynamic driving. Chrysler Voyager engine produces 35 HP less power than Renault Grand Espace, whereas torque is 48 NM less than Renault Grand Espace. Due to the lower power, Chrysler Voyager reaches 100 km/h speed 2.1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.7 | 7.6 | |
| Chrysler Voyager consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Renault Grand Espace, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Chrysler Voyager could require 15 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 75 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 970 km in combined cycle | 780 km in combined cycle | |
| 1150 km on highway | 900 km on highway | ||
| Chrysler Voyager gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.81 m | 4.86 m | |
| Width: | 2.00 m | 1.86 m | |
| Height: | 1.75 m | 1.75 m | |
| Chrysler Voyager is 5 cm shorter than the Renault Grand Espace, 14 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Seats: | no data | 7 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 456 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | no data | 456 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 3050 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.5 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chrysler Voyager is 0.1 metres more than that of the Renault Grand Espace. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`600 | 2`610 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | low | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 1800 | 3400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chrysler Voyager has
|
Renault Grand Espace has
| |