Chrysler Voyager 2001 vs Opel Vivaro 2003
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.5 Diesel | 2.5 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 140 HP | 135 HP | |
| Torque: | 312 NM | 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.9 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Chrysler Voyager engine produces 5 HP more power than Opel Vivaro, but torque is 8 NM less than Opel Vivaro. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.7 | 8.6 | |
|
The Chrysler Voyager is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Chrysler Voyager consumes 0.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Opel Vivaro, which means that by driving the Chrysler Voyager over 15,000 km in a year you can save 135 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 75 litres | 90 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 970 km in combined cycle | 1040 km in combined cycle | |
| 1150 km on highway | 1160 km on highway | ||
| Opel Vivaro gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.80 m | 4.78 m | |
| Width: | 2.00 m | 1.90 m | |
| Height: | 1.75 m | 1.96 m | |
|
Chrysler Voyager is larger, but lower. Chrysler Voyager is 2 cm longer than the Opel Vivaro, 10 cm wider, while the height of Chrysler Voyager is 21 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 1200 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 3100 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.5 meters | 12.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chrysler Voyager is 0.9 metres less than that of the Opel Vivaro, which means Chrysler Voyager can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`600 | 2`900 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | low | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 1400 | 3600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chrysler Voyager has
|
Opel Vivaro has
| |