Chrysler Voyager 1999 vs Seat Alhambra 1996
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.5 Diesel | 1.9 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing belt | |
| Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 114 HP | 90 HP | |
| Torque: | 262 NM | 202 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.8 seconds | 19.3 seconds | |
|
Chrysler Voyager is more dynamic to drive. Chrysler Voyager engine produces 24 HP more power than Seat Alhambra, whereas torque is 60 NM more than Seat Alhambra. Thanks to more power Chrysler Voyager reaches 100 km/h speed 5.5 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.2 | 6.5 | |
|
The Seat Alhambra is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Chrysler Voyager consumes 2.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Seat Alhambra, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Chrysler Voyager could require 405 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 75 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 810 km in combined cycle | 1070 km in combined cycle | |
| 1000 km on highway | 1320 km on highway | ||
| Seat Alhambra gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 350'000 km | 630'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Seat Alhambra engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 10 years | 6 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Jeep Grand Cherokee, Chrysler Grand Voyager, Jeep Cherokee | Installed on at least 8 other car models, including Volkswagen Golf, Audi A4, Audi A6, Volkswagen Vento | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.73 m | 4.62 m | |
| Width: | 1.92 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.74 m | 1.73 m | |
|
Chrysler Voyager is larger. Chrysler Voyager is 11 cm longer than the Seat Alhambra, 11 cm wider, while the height of Chrysler Voyager is 1 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.5 meters | 11.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chrysler Voyager is 0.2 metres less than that of the Seat Alhambra. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`600 | 2`000 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | below average | |
| Seat Alhambra has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Chrysler Voyager has serious deffects in 25 percent more cases than Seat Alhambra, so Seat Alhambra quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 800 | 1600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chrysler Voyager has
|
Seat Alhambra has
| |