Chrysler Voyager 1996 vs Chrysler Grand Voyager 1996
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.5 Diesel | 2.5 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 114 HP | 114 HP | |
| Torque: | 262 NM | 262 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.8 seconds | 13.8 seconds | |
| Chrysler Voyager and Chrysler Grand Voyager have the same engine power, the torque is the same for both cars. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.2 | 8.7 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 9.0 l/100km | 8.5 l/100km | |
|
The Chrysler Grand Voyager is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Chrysler Voyager consumes 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Chrysler Grand Voyager, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Chrysler Voyager could require 75 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Chrysler Voyager consumes 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Chrysler Grand Voyager. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 75 litres | 75 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 810 km in combined cycle | 860 km in combined cycle | |
| 1000 km on highway | 1040 km on highway | ||
| 830 km with real consumption | 880 km with real consumption | ||
| Chrysler Grand Voyager gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 350'000 km | 350'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 10 years | 10 years | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.73 m | 5.07 m | |
| Width: | 1.92 m | 1.92 m | |
| Height: | 1.74 m | 1.74 m | |
| Chrysler Voyager is 34 cm shorter than the Chrysler Grand Voyager, width is practically the same also the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 671 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 4880 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.5 meters | 12 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chrysler Voyager is 0.5 metres less than that of the Chrysler Grand Voyager, which means Chrysler Voyager can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`600 | 2`500 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 800 | 1000 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 7.7/10 | 7.0/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chrysler Voyager has
|
Chrysler Grand Voyager has
| |