Chrysler Voyager 1991 vs Nissan X-Trail 2001
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Body: | Minivan / MPV | Crossover / SUV | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Crossovers and SUVs have better off-road capabilities (higher ground clearance, can have 4x4 drive), they are preferable for driving on unpaved roads and rural areas. Also, the driver's seating position is higher in a crossover or SUVs, which provides better visibility also in city. This usually comes at the cost of higher fuel consumption, increased weight and higher maintenance costs. | |||
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Chrysler Voyager is available with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive, while Nissan X-Trail can be equipped only with four wheel (4x4) drive. All-wheel drive models tend to consume more fuel, so if you don't need off road capabilities, Chrysler Voyager also offers 2-wheel drive versions for fuel economy. 2WD versions also have lower maintenance costs. | |||
| Engines: | 2.5 - 3.3 | 2.0 - 2.5 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 99 - 163 HP | 114 - 165 HP | |
| Torque: | 179 - 260 NM | 192 - 270 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.3 - 16 seconds | 9.9 - 13.7 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.7 - 13.0 | 7.2 - 10.0 | |
|
Chrysler Voyager petrol engines consumes on average 1.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than Nissan X-Trail. On average, a Chrysler Voyager with diesel engines consumes about the same amount of fuel per 100 km as a Nissan X-Trail. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.52 m | 4.51 m | |
| Width: | 1.83 m | 1.76 m | |
| Height: | 1.73 m | 1.68 m | |
|
Chrysler Voyager is larger. Chrysler Voyager is 1 cm longer than the Nissan X-Trail, 7 cm wider, while the height of Chrysler Voyager is 5 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 671 litres | 410 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1841 litres | |
|
Chrysler Voyager has more luggage capacity. Chrysler Voyager has 261 litres more trunk space than the Nissan X-Trail. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12.5 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chrysler Voyager is 1.5 metres more than that of the Nissan X-Trail, which means Chrysler Voyager can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`511 | ~ 2`010 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | low | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 600 | 2000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chrysler Voyager has
|
Nissan X-Trail has
| |