Chrysler Voyager 2001 vs Skoda Roomster 2006
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Body: | Minivan / MPV | Estate car / wagon | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
| Engines: | 2.4 - 3.3 | 1.2 - 1.9 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 140 - 180 HP | 65 - 105 HP | |
| Torque: | 226 - 312 NM | 112 - 240 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.9 - 14.1 seconds | 10.9 - 16.9 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.7 - 12.7 | 5.1 - 7.9 | |
|
Chrysler Voyager petrol engines consumes on average 4.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than Skoda Roomster. On average, Chrysler Voyager equipped with diesel engines consume 2.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Roomster. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.80 m | 4.20 m | |
| Width: | 2.00 m | 1.68 m | |
| Height: | 1.75 m | 1.61 m | |
|
Chrysler Voyager is larger. Chrysler Voyager is 60 cm longer than the Skoda Roomster, 32 cm wider, while the height of Chrysler Voyager is 14 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 450 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1780 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.5 meters | 10.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chrysler Voyager is 1 metres more than that of the Skoda Roomster, which means Chrysler Voyager can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`600 | ~ 1`721 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | average | |
| Average price (€): | 1400 | 2200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chrysler Voyager has
|
Skoda Roomster has
| |