Chrysler Voyager 1996 vs Volkswagen Sharan 2000
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 2.4 - 3.8 | 1.8 - 2.8 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 114 - 166 HP | 90 - 204 HP | |
| Torque: | 229 - 307 NM | 170 - 310 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.7 - 15.1 seconds | 9.9 - 17.2 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.2 - 13.6 | 6.2 - 11.9 | |
|
Chrysler Voyager petrol engines consumes on average 1.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than Volkswagen Sharan. On average, Chrysler Voyager equipped with diesel engines consume 2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Sharan. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.73 m | 4.63 m | |
| Width: | 1.92 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.74 m | 1.73 m | |
|
Chrysler Voyager is larger. Chrysler Voyager is 10 cm longer than the Volkswagen Sharan, 11 cm wider, while the height of Chrysler Voyager is 1 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 450 litres | 256 litres | |
|
Chrysler Voyager has more luggage capacity. Chrysler Voyager has 194 litres more trunk space than the Volkswagen Sharan. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.5 meters | 11.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chrysler Voyager is 0.4 metres less than that of the Volkswagen Sharan, which means Chrysler Voyager can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`600 | ~ 1`954 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | low | |
| Average price (€): | 800 | 2600 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 7.7/10 | 6.1/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chrysler Voyager has
|
Volkswagen Sharan has
| |