Chrysler Voyager 1996 vs Chrysler Grand Voyager 1996
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engines: | 2.4 - 3.8 | 2.4 - 3.8 | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 114 - 166 HP | 114 - 178 HP | |
Torque: | 229 - 307 NM | 229 - 325 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.7 - 15.1 seconds | 11.7 - 13.8 seconds | |
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.2 - 13.6 | 8.7 - 14.2 | |
Chrysler Voyager petrol engines consumes on average 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than Chrysler Grand Voyager. On average, Chrysler Voyager equipped with diesel engines consume 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Chrysler Grand Voyager. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.73 m | 5.07 m | |
Width: | 1.92 m | 1.92 m | |
Height: | 1.74 m | 1.74 m | |
Chrysler Voyager is 34 cm shorter than the Chrysler Grand Voyager, width is practically the same also the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 450 litres | 671 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 4880 litres | |
Chrysler Grand Voyager has more luggage space. Chrysler Voyager has 221 litres less trunk space than the Chrysler Grand Voyager. | |||
Turning diameter: | 11.5 meters | 12 meters | |
The turning circle of the Chrysler Voyager is 0.5 metres less than that of the Chrysler Grand Voyager, which means Chrysler Voyager can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`600 | ~ 2`519 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | low | no data | |
Average price (€): | 800 | 1000 | |
Rating in user reviews: | 7.7/10 | 7.0/10 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Chrysler Voyager has
|
Chrysler Grand Voyager has
| |