Chrysler PT Cruiser 2006 vs Alfa Romeo Spider 2003

 
Chrysler PT Cruiser
2006 - 2010
Alfa Romeo Spider
2003 - 2006
Gearbox: AutomaticManual
Engine: 2.4 Petrol2.0 Petrol

Performance

Power: 143 HP150 HP
Torque: 220 NM181 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 12.2 seconds8.5 seconds
Alfa Romeo Spider is a more dynamic driving.
Chrysler PT Cruiser engine produces 7 HP less power than Alfa Romeo Spider, but torque is 39 NM more than Alfa Romeo Spider. Due to the lower power, Chrysler PT Cruiser reaches 100 km/h speed 3.7 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 10.49.2
The Alfa Romeo Spider is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
Chrysler PT Cruiser consumes 1.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Alfa Romeo Spider, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Chrysler PT Cruiser could require 180 litres more fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 57 litres70 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 540 km in combined cycle760 km in combined cycle
Alfa Romeo Spider gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Dimensions

Length: 4.29 m4.30 m
Width: 1.75 m1.78 m
Height: 1.54 m1.32 m
Chrysler PT Cruiser is smaller, but higher.
Chrysler PT Cruiser is 1 cm shorter than the Alfa Romeo Spider, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Chrysler PT Cruiser is 22 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 210 litres147 litres
Chrysler PT Cruiser has more luggage capacity.
Even though the car is shorter, Chrysler PT Cruiser has 63 litres more trunk space than the Alfa Romeo Spider. The Alfa Romeo Spider may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers.
Turning diameter: 12 meters11.2 meters
The turning circle of the Chrysler PT Cruiser is 0.8 metres more than that of the Alfa Romeo Spider, which means Chrysler PT Cruiser can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 1`0001`680
Safety: no datano data
Quality:
low
no data
Average price (€): 46006000
Pros and Cons: Chrysler PT Cruiser has
  • roomier boot
  • lower price
Alfa Romeo Spider has
  • more dynamic
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • better manoeuvrability
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv