Chrysler PT Cruiser 2006 vs Volkswagen Beetle 2005
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 2.4 (petrol) | 1.4 - 2.0 (petrol, diesel) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 143 - 223 HP | 75 - 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 220 - 332 NM | 126 - 240 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.6 - 12.2 seconds | 9.3 - 15.6 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.4 - 10.4 | 5.5 - 9.2 | |
|
Chrysler PT Cruiser petrol engines consumes on average 1.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than Volkswagen Beetle. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.29 m | 4.08 m | |
| Width: | 1.75 m | 1.72 m | |
| Height: | 1.54 m | 1.50 m | |
|
Chrysler PT Cruiser is larger. Chrysler PT Cruiser is 21 cm longer than the Volkswagen Beetle, 3 cm wider, while the height of Chrysler PT Cruiser is 4 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 210 litres | 201 litres | |
| Chrysler PT Cruiser has 9 litres more trunk space than the Volkswagen Beetle. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12 meters | 10.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chrysler PT Cruiser is 1.1 metres more than that of the Volkswagen Beetle, which means Chrysler PT Cruiser can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`000 | ~ 1`807 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | low | average | |
| Average price (€): | 4600 | 5000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chrysler PT Cruiser has
|
Volkswagen Beetle has
| |