Chrysler PT Cruiser 2000 vs Mercedes A class 1997
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.6 - 2.4 | 1.4 - 1.9 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 115 - 223 HP | 60 - 125 HP | |
| Torque: | 157 - 332 NM | 130 - 180 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.5 - 13.5 seconds | 8.8 - 18.8 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.9 - 10.5 | 4.5 - 8.2 | |
|
Chrysler PT Cruiser petrol engines consumes on average 1.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than Mercedes A class. On average, Chrysler PT Cruiser equipped with diesel engines consume 2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mercedes A class. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.32 m | 3.58 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.72 m | |
| Height: | 1.55 m | 1.60 m | |
| Chrysler PT Cruiser is 74 cm longer than the Mercedes A class, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Chrysler PT Cruiser is 5 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 390 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1700 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.1 meters | 10.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chrysler PT Cruiser is 0.4 metres more than that of the Mercedes A class, which means Chrysler PT Cruiser can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`000 | ~ 1`527 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | low | average | |
| Average price (€): | 1200 | 800 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 8.3/10 | 7.7/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chrysler PT Cruiser has
|
Mercedes A klase has
| |