Chrysler PT Cruiser 2000 vs Chrysler PT Cruiser 2006
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.6 - 2.4 | 1.6 - 2.4 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 115 - 223 HP | 115 - 223 HP | |
| Torque: | 157 - 332 NM | 157 - 332 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.5 - 13.5 seconds | 7.5 - 13.5 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.9 - 10.5 | 6.7 - 10.1 | |
|
Chrysler PT Cruiser 2000 petrol engines consumes on average 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than Chrysler PT Cruiser 2006. On average, Chrysler PT Cruiser 2000 equipped with diesel engines consume 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Chrysler PT Cruiser 2006. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.32 m | 4.29 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.55 m | 1.56 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Chrysler PT Cruiser 2000 is 3 cm longer than the Chrysler PT Cruiser 2006, width is practically the same , while the height of Chrysler PT Cruiser 2000 is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 538 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.1 meters | 11.1 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`000 | ~ 1`000 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | low | |
| Average price (€): | 1200 | 2000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chrysler PT Cruiser has
|
Chrysler PT Cruiser has
| |