Chrysler PT Cruiser 2000 vs Chrysler Neon 1999
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Body: | Hatchback | Sedan | |
|---|---|---|---|
| The hatchback generally has more luggage space thanks to a larger trunk door opening and the ability to convert the rear of the passenger compartment into luggage space. Sedans tend to be quieter than hatchbacks, due to a more isolated rear area. | |||
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
| Engines: | 1.6 - 2.4 (petrol, diesel) | 1.6 - 2.0 (petrol) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 115 - 223 HP | 115 - 133 HP | |
| Torque: | 157 - 332 NM | 157 - 177 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.5 - 13.5 seconds | 9 - 12.8 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.9 - 10.5 | 7.3 - 8.8 | |
|
Chrysler PT Cruiser petrol engines consumes on average 1.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than Chrysler Neon. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.32 m | 4.39 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.71 m | |
| Height: | 1.55 m | 1.42 m | |
|
Chrysler PT Cruiser is smaller, but higher. Chrysler PT Cruiser is 7 cm shorter than the Chrysler Neon, width is practically the same , while the height of Chrysler PT Cruiser is 13 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 370 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.1 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chrysler PT Cruiser is 0.3 metres more than that of the Chrysler Neon. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`000 | ~ 1`613 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 1200 | 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chrysler PT Cruiser has
|
Chrysler Neon has
| |