Chrysler Neon 1999 vs Hyundai Lantra 1998
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 1.9 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 133 HP | 68 HP | |
| Torque: | 177 NM | 120 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.8 seconds | 16.5 seconds | |
|
Chrysler Neon is more dynamic to drive. Chrysler Neon engine produces 65 HP more power than Hyundai Lantra, whereas torque is 57 NM more than Hyundai Lantra. Thanks to more power Chrysler Neon reaches 100 km/h speed 3.7 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.8 | 6.4 | |
|
The Hyundai Lantra is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Chrysler Neon consumes 2.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Hyundai Lantra, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Chrysler Neon could require 360 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 47 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 530 km in combined cycle | 850 km in combined cycle | |
| 670 km on highway | 1100 km on highway | ||
| Hyundai Lantra gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.39 m | 4.45 m | |
| Width: | 1.71 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.40 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Chrysler Neon is 6 cm shorter than the Hyundai Lantra, 1 cm wider, while the height of Chrysler Neon is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 370 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 10.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chrysler Neon is 0.3 metres more than that of the Hyundai Lantra. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`600 | 1`000 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 800 | 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chrysler Neon has
|
Hyundai Lantra has
| |