Chrysler Neon 1999 vs Ford Mondeo 2000
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.8 Petrol | 1.8 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 122 HP | 110 HP | |
| Torque: | 160 NM | 165 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9 seconds | 11.6 seconds | |
|
Chrysler Neon is more dynamic to drive. Chrysler Neon engine produces 12 HP more power than Ford Mondeo, but torque is 5 NM less than Ford Mondeo. Thanks to more power Chrysler Neon reaches 100 km/h speed 2.6 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.5 | 7.7 | |
|
The Ford Mondeo is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Chrysler Neon consumes 0.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford Mondeo, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Chrysler Neon could require 120 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 47 litres | 59 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 550 km in combined cycle | 760 km in combined cycle | |
| 670 km on highway | 1050 km on highway | ||
| Ford Mondeo gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.39 m | 4.73 m | |
| Width: | 1.71 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.43 m | |
|
Chrysler Neon is smaller. Chrysler Neon is 34 cm shorter than the Ford Mondeo, 10 cm narrower, while the height of Chrysler Neon is 1 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 370 litres | 500 litres | |
|
Ford Mondeo has more luggage space. Chrysler Neon has 130 litres less trunk space than the Ford Mondeo. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 11.1 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chrysler Neon is 0.3 metres less than that of the Ford Mondeo. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 1`865 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 800 | 1200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chrysler Neon has
|
Ford Mondeo has
| |