Chrysler Grand Voyager 1992 vs Mitsubishi Space Wagon 1992
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.5 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 118 HP | 82 HP | |
| Torque: | 250 NM | 172 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.5 seconds | 17.8 seconds | |
|
Chrysler Grand Voyager is more dynamic to drive. Chrysler Grand Voyager engine produces 36 HP more power than Mitsubishi Space Wagon, whereas torque is 78 NM more than Mitsubishi Space Wagon. Thanks to more power Chrysler Grand Voyager reaches 100 km/h speed 5.3 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.7 | 8.1 | |
|
The Chrysler Grand Voyager is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Chrysler Grand Voyager consumes 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Space Wagon, which means that by driving the Chrysler Grand Voyager over 15,000 km in a year you can save 60 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 75 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 970 km in combined cycle | 740 km in combined cycle | |
| Chrysler Grand Voyager gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.90 m | 4.50 m | |
| Width: | 1.83 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.74 m | 1.58 m | |
|
Chrysler Grand Voyager is larger. Chrysler Grand Voyager is 40 cm longer than the Mitsubishi Space Wagon, 13 cm wider, while the height of Chrysler Grand Voyager is 16 cm higher. | |||
| Seats: | no data | 7 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | 3990 litres | 212 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | no data | 212 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | 3990 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
3990 litres | 1714 litres | |
| The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Chrysler Grand Voyager (by 2276 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 13.2 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chrysler Grand Voyager is 2.2 metres more than that of the Mitsubishi Space Wagon, which means Chrysler Grand Voyager can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`550 | 1`900 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 1600 | 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chrysler Grand Voyager has
|
Mitsubishi Space Wagon has
| |