Chrysler Grand Voyager 1992 vs Mitsubishi Space Runner 1995
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.5 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 118 HP | 82 HP | |
| Torque: | 250 NM | 172 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.5 seconds | 17.8 seconds | |
|
Chrysler Grand Voyager is more dynamic to drive. Chrysler Grand Voyager engine produces 36 HP more power than Mitsubishi Space Runner, whereas torque is 78 NM more than Mitsubishi Space Runner. Thanks to more power Chrysler Grand Voyager reaches 100 km/h speed 5.3 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.7 | 8.1 | |
|
The Chrysler Grand Voyager is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Chrysler Grand Voyager consumes 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Space Runner, which means that by driving the Chrysler Grand Voyager over 15,000 km in a year you can save 60 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 75 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 970 km in combined cycle | 740 km in combined cycle | |
| Chrysler Grand Voyager gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.90 m | 4.27 m | |
| Width: | 1.83 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.74 m | 1.66 m | |
|
Chrysler Grand Voyager is larger. Chrysler Grand Voyager is 63 cm longer than the Mitsubishi Space Runner, 13 cm wider, while the height of Chrysler Grand Voyager is 8 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 3990 litres | 676 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
3990 litres | 1498 litres | |
|
Chrysler Grand Voyager has more luggage capacity. Chrysler Grand Voyager has 3314 litres more trunk space than the Mitsubishi Space Runner. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Chrysler Grand Voyager (by 2492 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 13.2 meters | 10.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chrysler Grand Voyager is 3 metres more than that of the Mitsubishi Space Runner, which means Chrysler Grand Voyager can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`550 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 1600 | 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chrysler Grand Voyager has
|
Mitsubishi Space Runner has
| |