Chrysler Grand Voyager 1992 vs Chrysler Voyager 1994
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.5 Diesel | 2.5 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 118 HP | 99 HP | |
| Torque: | 250 NM | 185 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.5 seconds | 16 seconds | |
|
Chrysler Grand Voyager is more dynamic to drive. Chrysler Grand Voyager engine produces 19 HP more power than Chrysler Voyager, whereas torque is 65 NM more than Chrysler Voyager. Thanks to more power Chrysler Grand Voyager reaches 100 km/h speed 3.5 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.7 | 9.4 | |
|
The Chrysler Grand Voyager is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Chrysler Grand Voyager consumes 1.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Chrysler Voyager, which means that by driving the Chrysler Grand Voyager over 15,000 km in a year you can save 255 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 75 litres | 75 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 970 km in combined cycle | 790 km in combined cycle | |
| Chrysler Grand Voyager gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.90 m | 4.52 m | |
| Width: | 1.83 m | 1.83 m | |
| Height: | 1.74 m | 1.70 m | |
| Chrysler Grand Voyager is 38 cm longer than the Chrysler Voyager, width is practically the same , while the height of Chrysler Grand Voyager is 4 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 3990 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
3990 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 13.2 meters | 12.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chrysler Grand Voyager is 0.7 metres more than that of the Chrysler Voyager, which means Chrysler Grand Voyager can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`550 | 1`600 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | low | |
| Average price (€): | 1600 | 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chrysler Grand Voyager has
|
Chrysler Voyager has
| |