Chrysler Grand Voyager 1992 vs Volkswagen Multivan 1996
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.5 Diesel | 2.5 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 118 HP | 88 HP | |
| Torque: | 250 NM | 195 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.5 seconds | 23.7 seconds | |
|
Chrysler Grand Voyager is more dynamic to drive. Chrysler Grand Voyager engine produces 30 HP more power than Volkswagen Multivan, whereas torque is 55 NM more than Volkswagen Multivan. Thanks to more power Chrysler Grand Voyager reaches 100 km/h speed 11.2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.7 | 8.3 | |
|
The Chrysler Grand Voyager is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Chrysler Grand Voyager consumes 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Multivan, which means that by driving the Chrysler Grand Voyager over 15,000 km in a year you can save 90 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 75 litres | 80 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 970 km in combined cycle | 960 km in combined cycle | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.90 m | 4.79 m | |
| Width: | 1.83 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.74 m | 1.92 m | |
| Chrysler Grand Voyager is 11 cm longer than the Volkswagen Multivan, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Chrysler Grand Voyager is 18 cm lower. | |||
| Seats: | no data | 7 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | 3990 litres | no data | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | 3990 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
3990 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 13.2 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`550 | 2`700 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 1600 | 4200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chrysler Grand Voyager has
|
| |