Chrysler Grand Voyager 2011 vs Chrysler Voyager 2004
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.8 Diesel | 2.8 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 163 HP | 149 HP | |
| Torque: | 360 NM | 360 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.8 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Chrysler Grand Voyager engine produces 14 HP more power than Chrysler Voyager, the torque is the same for both cars. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.4 | 8.4 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 75 litres | 75 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 890 km in combined cycle | 890 km in combined cycle | |
| 1070 km on highway | 1130 km on highway | ||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.18 m | 4.81 m | |
| Width: | 2.00 m | 2.00 m | |
| Height: | 1.75 m | 1.75 m | |
| Chrysler Grand Voyager is 37 cm longer than the Chrysler Voyager, width is practically the same also the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 638 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
3296 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 12 meters | 11.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chrysler Grand Voyager is 0.5 metres more than that of the Chrysler Voyager, which means Chrysler Grand Voyager can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`775 | 1`600 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | low | |
| Average price (€): | 9200 | 1800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chrysler Grand Voyager has
|
Chrysler Voyager has
| |