Chrysler Grand Voyager 2008 vs Volkswagen Caravelle 2009
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.8 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 163 HP | 180 HP | |
| Torque: | 360 NM | 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.8 seconds | 11.4 seconds | |
|
Volkswagen Caravelle is a more dynamic driving. Chrysler Grand Voyager engine produces 17 HP less power than Volkswagen Caravelle, whereas torque is 40 NM less than Volkswagen Caravelle. Due to the lower power, Chrysler Grand Voyager reaches 100 km/h speed 1.4 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.3 | 8.0 | |
|
The Volkswagen Caravelle is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Chrysler Grand Voyager consumes 1.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Caravelle, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Chrysler Grand Voyager could require 195 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 75 litres | 80 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 800 km in combined cycle | 1000 km in combined cycle | |
| Volkswagen Caravelle gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.14 m | 5.29 m | |
| Width: | 1.95 m | 1.90 m | |
| Height: | 1.75 m | 1.99 m | |
| Chrysler Grand Voyager is 15 cm shorter than the Volkswagen Caravelle, 5 cm wider, while the height of Chrysler Grand Voyager is 24 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 638 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
3296 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.9 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`775 | 3`000 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 5000 | 24 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chrysler Grand Voyager has
|
Volkswagen Caravelle has
| |