Chrysler Grand Voyager 2008 vs Renault Trafic 2006
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.8 Diesel | 2.5 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 163 HP | 145 HP | |
| Torque: | 360 NM | 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.8 seconds | 8.7 seconds | |
| Chrysler Grand Voyager engine produces 18 HP more power than Renault Trafic, whereas torque is 40 NM more than Renault Trafic. Despite the higher power, Chrysler Grand Voyager reaches 100 km/h speed 4.1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.3 | 8.7 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 9.8 l/100km | 8.6 l/100km | |
|
The Renault Trafic is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Chrysler Grand Voyager consumes 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Renault Trafic, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Chrysler Grand Voyager could require 90 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Chrysler Grand Voyager consumes 1.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Renault Trafic. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 75 litres | 90 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 800 km in combined cycle | 1030 km in combined cycle | |
| 1020 km on highway | 1180 km on highway | ||
| 760 km with real consumption | 1040 km with real consumption | ||
| Renault Trafic gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 12 years | 15 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Jeep Cherokee, Jeep Wrangler, Dodge Nitro | Used only for this car | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.14 m | 5.18 m | |
| Width: | 1.95 m | 1.90 m | |
| Height: | 1.75 m | 1.96 m | |
| Chrysler Grand Voyager is 4 cm shorter than the Renault Trafic, 5 cm wider, while the height of Chrysler Grand Voyager is 21 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 638 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
3296 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.9 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`775 | 2`925 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 5000 | 4600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chrysler Grand Voyager has
|
Renault Trafic has
| |