Chrysler Grand Voyager 2004 vs Ford Galaxy 2007
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.8 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain and belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 149 HP | 130 HP | |
| Torque: | 360 NM | 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12 seconds | 11.2 seconds | |
| Chrysler Grand Voyager engine produces 19 HP more power than Ford Galaxy, whereas torque is 40 NM more than Ford Galaxy. Despite the higher power, Chrysler Grand Voyager reaches 100 km/h speed 0.8 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.5 | 7.4 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 10.2 l/100km | 8.7 l/100km | |
|
The Ford Galaxy is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Chrysler Grand Voyager consumes 1.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford Galaxy, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Chrysler Grand Voyager could require 165 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Chrysler Grand Voyager consumes 1.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford Galaxy. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 75 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 880 km in combined cycle | 940 km in combined cycle | |
| 730 km with real consumption | 800 km with real consumption | ||
| Ford Galaxy gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 440'000 km | 560'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Ford Galaxy engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 7 years | 9 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Chrysler Voyager, Jeep Cherokee | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Ford Mondeo, Ford Focus, Ford S-Max, Ford C-Max | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Ford Galaxy might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.10 m | 4.82 m | |
| Width: | 2.00 m | 1.85 m | |
| Height: | 1.75 m | 1.72 m | |
|
Chrysler Grand Voyager is larger. Chrysler Grand Voyager is 28 cm longer than the Ford Galaxy, 15 cm wider, while the height of Chrysler Grand Voyager is 3 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 920 litres | 390 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
4130 litres | no data | |
|
Chrysler Grand Voyager has more luggage capacity. Chrysler Grand Voyager has 530 litres more trunk space than the Ford Galaxy. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12 meters | 11.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chrysler Grand Voyager is 0.4 metres more than that of the Ford Galaxy, which means Chrysler Grand Voyager can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`630 | 2`505 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 2000 | 4200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chrysler Grand Voyager has
|
Ford Galaxy has
| |