Chrysler Grand Voyager 2004 vs Kia Carnival 2006
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.8 Diesel | 2.9 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 149 HP | 185 HP | |
| Torque: | 360 NM | 343 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Chrysler Grand Voyager engine produces 36 HP less power than Kia Carnival, but torque is 17 NM more than Kia Carnival. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.5 | 7.8 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 10.2 l/100km | 11.9 l/100km | |
|
The Chrysler Grand Voyager is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Chrysler Grand Voyager consumes 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Kia Carnival, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Chrysler Grand Voyager could require 105 litres more fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Chrysler Grand Voyager consumes 1.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Kia Carnival. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 75 litres | 80 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 880 km in combined cycle | 1020 km in combined cycle | |
| 1110 km on highway | 1250 km on highway | ||
| 730 km with real consumption | 670 km with real consumption | ||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 7 years | 18 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Chrysler Voyager, Jeep Cherokee | Used also on Hyundai Terracan | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.10 m | 4.81 m | |
| Width: | 2.00 m | 1.98 m | |
| Height: | 1.75 m | 1.82 m | |
|
Chrysler Grand Voyager is larger, but lower. Chrysler Grand Voyager is 29 cm longer than the Kia Carnival, 2 cm wider, while the height of Chrysler Grand Voyager is 7 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 920 litres | 364 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
4130 litres | 1666 litres | |
|
Chrysler Grand Voyager has more luggage capacity. Chrysler Grand Voyager has 556 litres more trunk space than the Kia Carnival. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Chrysler Grand Voyager (by 2464 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12 meters | 11.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chrysler Grand Voyager is 0.4 metres more than that of the Kia Carnival, which means Chrysler Grand Voyager can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`630 | 2`920 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | low | |
| Average price (€): | 2000 | 3400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chrysler Grand Voyager has
|
Kia Carnival has
| |