Chrysler Grand Voyager 2001 vs Mazda MPV 1999
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.3 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing belt | |
| Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 180 HP | 122 HP | |
| Torque: | 285 NM | 175 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.6 seconds | 14.2 seconds | |
|
Chrysler Grand Voyager is more dynamic to drive. Chrysler Grand Voyager engine produces 58 HP more power than Mazda MPV, whereas torque is 110 NM more than Mazda MPV. Thanks to more power Chrysler Grand Voyager reaches 100 km/h speed 1.6 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 12.7 | 10.1 | |
|
The Mazda MPV is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Chrysler Grand Voyager consumes 2.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda MPV, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Chrysler Grand Voyager could require 390 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 75 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 590 km in combined cycle | 690 km in combined cycle | |
| 750 km on highway | 810 km on highway | ||
| Mazda MPV gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 480'000 km | 630'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Mazda MPV engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 10 years | 7 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Chrysler Voyager, Chrysler Town & Country | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Mazda 323, Mazda Premacy | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Chrysler Grand Voyager might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Chrysler Grand Voyager engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.09 m | 4.75 m | |
| Width: | 2.00 m | 1.83 m | |
| Height: | 1.75 m | 1.74 m | |
|
Chrysler Grand Voyager is larger. Chrysler Grand Voyager is 34 cm longer than the Mazda MPV, 17 cm wider, while the height of Chrysler Grand Voyager is 1 cm higher. | |||
| Seats: | no data | 7 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | 920 litres | 294 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | no data | 294 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | 920 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
4130 litres | 1600 litres | |
| The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Chrysler Grand Voyager (by 2530 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chrysler Grand Voyager is 0.6 metres more than that of the Mazda MPV, which means Chrysler Grand Voyager can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`630 | 2`230 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 1400 | 1000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chrysler Grand Voyager has
|
Mazda MPV has
| |