Chrysler Grand Voyager 2011 vs Volkswagen Touran 2010
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.4 Petrol | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 147 HP | 140 HP | |
| Torque: | 218 NM | 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 9.9 seconds | |
| Chrysler Grand Voyager engine produces 7 HP more power than Volkswagen Touran, but torque is 102 NM less than Volkswagen Touran. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 5.7 | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.10 m | 4.40 m | |
| Width: | 2.00 m | 1.79 m | |
| Height: | 1.80 m | 1.67 m | |
|
Chrysler Grand Voyager is larger. Chrysler Grand Voyager is 70 cm longer than the Volkswagen Touran, 20 cm wider, while the height of Chrysler Grand Voyager is 13 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 748 litres | 695 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
4550 litres | 1989 litres | |
|
Chrysler Grand Voyager has more luggage capacity. Chrysler Grand Voyager has 53 litres more trunk space than the Volkswagen Touran. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Chrysler Grand Voyager (by 2561 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 11.2 meters | |
| Power steering: | Hydraulic power steering | Electric power steering | |
| Hydraulic power steering is technologically more complex, louder, increases fuel consumption and requires more servicing. It has the advantages of more power, less strain on the car's electrical system and better feedback (feeling) when steering. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 2`220 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 9400 | 7000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chrysler Grand Voyager has
|
Volkswagen Touran has
| |