Chrysler Grand Voyager 2011 vs Chrysler Voyager 2004
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.3 Petrol | 3.3 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 172 HP | 180 HP | |
| Torque: | 278 NM | 285 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 12.6 seconds | |
| Chrysler Grand Voyager engine produces 8 HP less power than Chrysler Voyager, whereas torque is 7 NM less than Chrysler Voyager. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.3 | 12.7 | |
|
The Chrysler Grand Voyager is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Chrysler Grand Voyager consumes 1.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Chrysler Voyager, which means that by driving the Chrysler Grand Voyager over 15,000 km in a year you can save 210 litres of fuel. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.10 m | 4.81 m | |
| Width: | 2.00 m | 2.00 m | |
| Height: | 1.80 m | 1.75 m | |
| Chrysler Grand Voyager is 29 cm longer than the Chrysler Voyager, width is practically the same , while the height of Chrysler Grand Voyager is 5 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 748 litres | 440 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
4550 litres | no data | |
|
Chrysler Grand Voyager has more luggage capacity. Chrysler Grand Voyager has 308 litres more trunk space than the Chrysler Voyager. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 11.5 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 1`600 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | low | |
| Average price (€): | 9200 | 1800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chrysler Grand Voyager has
|
Chrysler Voyager has
| |