Chrysler Grand Voyager 1990 vs Chrysler Voyager 1991
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 2.5 - 3.3 | 2.5 - 3.3 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 118 - 163 HP | 99 - 163 HP | |
| Torque: | 241 - 260 NM | 179 - 260 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.5 - 13.9 seconds | 12.3 - 16 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.7 - 12.5 | 6.7 - 13.0 | |
|
Chrysler Grand Voyager petrol engines consumes on average 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than Chrysler Voyager. On average, Chrysler Grand Voyager equipped with diesel engines consume 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Chrysler Voyager. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.90 m | 4.52 m | |
| Width: | 1.83 m | 1.83 m | |
| Height: | 1.73 m | 1.73 m | |
| Chrysler Grand Voyager is 38 cm longer than the Chrysler Voyager, width is practically the same also the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 3990 litres | 671 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
3990 litres | no data | |
|
Chrysler Grand Voyager has more luggage capacity. Chrysler Grand Voyager has 3319 litres more trunk space than the Chrysler Voyager. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 13.2 meters | 12.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chrysler Grand Voyager is 0.7 metres more than that of the Chrysler Voyager, which means Chrysler Grand Voyager can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`548 | ~ 1`511 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | low | |
| Average price (€): | 1600 | 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chrysler Grand Voyager has
|
Chrysler Voyager has
| |