Chrysler Grand Voyager 2008 vs Volvo XC90 2006
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Body: | Minivan / MPV | Crossover / SUV | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Crossovers and SUVs have better off-road capabilities (higher ground clearance, can have 4x4 drive), they are preferable for driving on unpaved roads and rural areas. Also, the driver's seating position is higher in a crossover or SUVs, which provides better visibility also in city. This usually comes at the cost of higher fuel consumption, increased weight and higher maintenance costs. | |||
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
| Chrysler Grand Voyager is available only with automatic gearbox, whereas Volvo XC90 has both automatic and manual transmission options. | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Chrysler Grand Voyager is available only with front wheel drive, while Volvo XC90 can be equipped with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive. | |||
| Engines: | 2.8 - 3.8 | 2.4 - 4.4 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 163 - 193 HP | 163 - 315 HP | |
| Torque: | 305 - 360 NM | 320 - 440 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.6 - 12.8 seconds | 7.3 - 12 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.3 - 12.7 | 8.2 - 13.5 | |
|
Chrysler Grand Voyager petrol engines consumes on average 0.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than Volvo XC90. On average, Chrysler Grand Voyager equipped with diesel engines consume 0.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo XC90. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.14 m | 4.81 m | |
| Width: | 1.95 m | 1.91 m | |
| Height: | 1.75 m | 1.77 m | |
|
Chrysler Grand Voyager is larger, but slightly lower. Chrysler Grand Voyager is 33 cm longer than the Volvo XC90, 4 cm wider, while the height of Chrysler Grand Voyager is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 638 litres | 249 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
3296 litres | 1837 litres | |
|
Chrysler Grand Voyager has more luggage capacity. Chrysler Grand Voyager has 389 litres more trunk space than the Volvo XC90. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Chrysler Grand Voyager (by 1459 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.9 meters | 12.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chrysler Grand Voyager is 0.6 metres less than that of the Volvo XC90, which means Chrysler Grand Voyager can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`733 | ~ 2`735 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | low | |
| Average price (€): | 5400 | 9000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chrysler Grand Voyager has
|
Volvo XC90 has
| |