Chrysler 300C 2005 vs Chrysler 300C 2004
| Body: | Sedan | Estate car / wagon | |
|---|---|---|---|
| The wagon generally has more cargo space due to a larger trunk door opening, a roof that extends as far back as possible, and the ability to convert the rear of the passenger compartment into cargo space. Sedans tend to be quieter than wagons due to a more isolated rear area. | |||
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
| Engine: | 5.7 Petrol | 5.7 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 340 HP | 340 HP | |
| Torque: | 525 NM | 525 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 6.4 seconds | |
| Chrysler 300C 2005 and Chrysler 300C 2004 have the same engine power, the torque is the same for both cars. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 12.1 | 13.0 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 14.2 l/100km | 14.5 l/100km | |
|
By specification Chrysler 300C 2005 consumes 0.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Chrysler 300C 2004, which means that by driving the Chrysler 300C 2005 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 135 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Chrysler 300C 2005 consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Chrysler 300C 2004. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 71 litres | 71 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 580 km in combined cycle | 540 km in combined cycle | |
| 690 km on highway | 710 km on highway | ||
| 500 km with real consumption | 480 km with real consumption | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 520'000 km | 520'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 4 years | 4 years | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.02 m | 5.00 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 1.88 m | |
| Height: | 1.48 m | 1.51 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Chrysler 300C 2005 is 2 cm longer than the Chrysler 300C 2004, width is practically the same , while the height of Chrysler 300C 2005 is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 504 litres | 630 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
504 litres | 1602 litres | |
|
Chrysler 300C 2004 has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Chrysler 300C 2005 has 126 litres less trunk space than the Chrysler 300C 2004. This could mean that the Chrysler 300C 2005 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Chrysler 300C 2004 (by 1098 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12 meters | 12 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 2`425 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 4000 | 5000 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 8.0/10 | 8.0/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chrysler 300C has
|
Chrysler 300C has
| |