Chrysler 300C 2005 vs Ford Mustang 2006
| Body: | Sedan | Coupe | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
| Engine: | 5.7 Petrol | 5.4 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 340 HP | 500 HP | |
| Torque: | 525 NM | 650 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 4.5 seconds | |
| Chrysler 300C engine produces 160 HP less power than Ford Mustang, whereas torque is 125 NM less than Ford Mustang. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 12.1 | 11.6 | |
| Chrysler 300C consumes 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford Mustang, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Chrysler 300C could require 75 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 71 litres | 61 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 580 km in combined cycle | 520 km in combined cycle | |
| 690 km on highway | 640 km on highway | ||
| Chrysler 300C gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.02 m | 4.75 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 1.88 m | |
| Height: | 1.48 m | 1.38 m | |
|
Chrysler 300C is larger. Chrysler 300C is 27 cm longer than the Ford Mustang, width is practically the same , while the height of Chrysler 300C is 10 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 504 litres | 348 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
504 litres | no data | |
|
Chrysler 300C has more luggage capacity. Chrysler 300C has 156 litres more trunk space than the Ford Mustang. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 4200 | 11 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chrysler 300C has
|
Ford Mustang has
| |